Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jones v. Gill et al
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Eric Ison Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Sim Gill, Brett Robinson and Tyson V. Hamilton
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Nelson
as 4:2020cv00053
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Respondent:
Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamilton v. Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
as 2:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Medical Department, Sidney G. Roberts, Kennon Tubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Utah and David J Angerhofer PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00199
Petitioner:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Respondent:
State of Utah and Scott Crowther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bacon v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Defendant:
Corie Hamilton, Christopher Jacobson and Nathan Lyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Bautista et al
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Defendant:
Rudy Bautista and Tyson V. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Mount et al
as 2:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Defendant:
Harry Mount, Cade Martin, Holly R. Shick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Walters et al
as 2:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Defendant:
Pete Walters, Scott L. Christensen, Alfred C. Bigelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv00114
Petitioner:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Respondent:
USA, State of Utah, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
