Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guo v. Hansen et al
as 5:2020cv00477
Petitioner:
Wenzhu Guo
Respondent:
Ralph Hansen, FNU Fox and Great Plains Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beals v. Weygand et al
as 5:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Beals
Defendant:
Sammy Weygand, Marc Daniels, Tanner Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirtman v. Grismer et al
as 5:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene Kirtman
Defendant:
Margaret Grismer, Todd Lawrence, Katherine Demer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 5:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Edward V Ray, III
Defendant:
S Bradford, R Ferguson, Moates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirtman v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene Kirtman
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution El Reno OK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hansen v. Moham et al
as 5:2013cv00199
Petitioner:
Judie Ann Hansen
Respondent:
Rickey W Moham and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 5:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Edward V Ray, Jr
Defendant:
Mrs Bradford, Ms Hagerman, R Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hansen
as 5:2011cv01468
Plaintiff:
Robert LaDell Johnson
Defendant:
Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flow v. Thomas et al
as 5:2009cv01262
Plaintiff:
Jason Urian Flow
Defendant:
Lt Thomas, Cory Green, Lieutenant Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
