Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Terry Hendrix v. John Kitzhaber, et al
as 13-35367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY C. HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KITZHABER, Governor, THEODORE KULONGSKI, ROBERT HERMAN and others
Hendrix v. Kitzhaber et al
as 3:2013cv00149
Defendant:
Beth Heckert, Robert Herman, Mark Huddleston and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Terry C. Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Harris v. Vargo, et al
as 10-35490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN PHILLIP HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
VARGO, Dr., HARDY MYERS, STEVE SHELTON, M.D. and others
Matthew Young v. Max Williams, et al
as 09-35088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW ROBERT YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
MAX WILLIAMS, Director of ODOC, MARK NOOTH, Superintendent of SRCI, HARDY MYERS, Oregon State Attorney General and others
Drollinger v. Gerber et al
as 3:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Drollinger
Defendant:
Susan R. Gerber, Hardy Myers and Gary Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christensen v. Myers et al
as 6:2008cv01471
Petitioner:
Mark Frances Christensen
Respondent:
Hardy Myers, Steven R. Powers and M. Max Williams, II
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Nooth et al
as 3:2008cv01138
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Young
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, Max Williams, Hardy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reynolds v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2008cv06261
Plaintiff:
Steven Carlos Reynolds
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Hardy Myers, Multnomah County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 6:2007cv06315
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert A. Fiatal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Kulongoski et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
Steve Hill
Defendant:
Ted Kulongoski, Hardy Myers, Max Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
