Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Klask v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brenda Klask
Defendant:
CO K. Miller, Sheriff Carmine Marceno, Lieutenant V. Amoroso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRING v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
STEVE HERRING
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Mercado et al
as 2:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry and Mosheh Ben Israel
Defendant:
Mercado, Jason Brenes, C. Sboto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Moody et al
as 2:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry and Mosheh Ben Israel
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ricky Dixion, Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herring v. RRC Director
as 9:2023cv80827
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Latravis Herring
Defendant:
RRC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HEERLING v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
SHANE MICHAEL HERRING and SHANE MICHAEL HEERLING
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Cicarrno et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Byron Andrews
Defendant:
Sgt. Cicarrno, M. Herring, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Byron Andrews
Defendant:
J.L. Tucker, Albertson, Mckennzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Herring et al
as 9:2022cv81379
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Quancia Herring, Norris Fuse, Adam Ballau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradham v. Herring
as 9:2022cv81000
Plaintiff:
Marcus Irwin Bradham
Defendant:
A. Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
