Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Taylor v. State of Texas et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
State of Texas, Richard King Estate, San Houston Estate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spackman v. Hood et al
as 2:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Bobby Allen Spackman
Defendant:
Sgt. E. Hood, 15 Unnamed Corr. Officers and Lt. S. Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Reyes et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Petitioner:
Ronnie C. Walker
Respondent:
E. Reyes and State of Oregon
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Tyler Blewett, Sgt. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00693
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. Hammon et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
M. Gower, John Doe #2, 3, 4, 5, R. Persson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camirand v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv01829
Defendant:
Mr. Young, T. Blewett, Mr. Gekler and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Leander Camirand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emery v. Nooth et al
as 2:2019cv01070
Defendant:
Lt. R. A. Young, M. Andrews, A. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Hughs et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Amber Terry, Asst. Supt. Jackson, Lt. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rojas et al
as 2:2018cv00815
Defendant:
John Doe, M. Fuentas, Lieutentant Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. Franke et al
as 2:2018cv00257
Defendant:
Noah Berry, Lavelle H. Braun, Ted Chase and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
