Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Crump v. Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv03089
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC, J. Ehrlich, Calvin Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartzell v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv03034
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Hartzell, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DeLaCruz v. Commandant
as 5:2024cv03030
Petitioner:
Randy J. DeLaCruz
Respondent:
Commandant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tahchawwickah v. Seward County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tahchawwickah
Defendant:
Seward County Jail, Mathew Fenn, J. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2024cv03013
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee (ID 113662) v. Channell
as 5:2023cv03245
Plaintiff:
Antonio Alexander McGee
Defendant:
Austin J. Channell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis (ID 98308) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03236
Plaintiff:
Tony Tremayne Lewis
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, David C. Ferris, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler (ID 126080) v. Topeka Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2023cv03218
Plaintiff:
Katelynn J. Fowler
Defendant:
Topeka Correctional Facility and (fnu) Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd (ID 74149) v. McCausland
as 5:2023cv03210
Plaintiff:
Todd J. Lloyd
Defendant:
Paul S. McCausland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingsley (ID 54123) v. Groene et al
as 5:2023cv03207
Plaintiff:
Alan W. Kingsley
Defendant:
Steven A. Groene, Seth A. Vernon, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
