Cases 1 - 10 of 3,404
Skyberg v. Newman et al
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jason Skyberg
Defendant:
Brian J. Newman and Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Chief Roy Finner et al
as 4:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
James Edward Hicks
Defendant:
Chief Roy Finner, J. Torres and K9 Dog and Handler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Borik et al
as 7:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Herrado J. Molina
Defendant:
Michelle C. Borik, Isatu Bangura, Bobby L. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin B. Smith, Christopher M. Wiedau, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Martinez
as 7:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Herrado J. Molina
Defendant:
Sergio Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01254
Petitioner:
Tiuan J Moore
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clay v. Schiwart et al
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Tyrone La'Shawn Clay
Defendant:
Carl Schiwart, Jana Harrison, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. J. Frago et al
as 4:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
J. Frago, Officer Harrington and Sargent C. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01803
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mousavi v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ali Mousavi
Defendant:
Director Alejandro N. Mayorkas, US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. Randy Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
