Cases 1 - 10 of 26
(PC) Roman v. Eaton et al
as 1:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Isidro Roman
Defendant:
Patrict Eaton, A. Ramirez, K. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)O'Neil v. Bunch et al
as 1:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Michael P. O'Neil
Defendant:
A. Bunch, Escamilla, E. Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yahshalom B.J. Gray v. L.A. County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Yahshalom B.J. Gray
Defendant:
L.A. County Sheriff Dept., Jonathan Hill, J. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Harris v. Moore
as 1:2022cv00601
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Harris
Respondent:
Sean Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Drumwright v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv02286
Plaintiff:
Marquise Drumwright
Defendant:
B. Jones, J. Harris, C. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Alvarez v. Eaton et al
as 1:2020cv01622
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, L. Bird, P. Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcos Munoz v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04345
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, C. Estrada, C. Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Brown v. Winn-Reed et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant:
N. Fransham, Ralph Diaz, P. Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Carlton Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin J Harris v. M. Barroso et al
as 2:2019cv00800
Plaintiff:
Melvin J Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. M. Barroso, Lt. H. Clavijo and Captain R. Quintero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcos Munoz v. Los Angeles County Mental Health et al
as 2:2018cv10265
Defendant:
C. Estrada, Los Angeles County Mental Health, J. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Muniz and Marcos Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
