Cases 1 - 10 of 4,161
Buchanan v. Hanley et al
as 1:2024cv05352
Plaintiff:
Markus Buchanan
Defendant:
J. Hanley, Kwame Raoul and Thomas Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
Terrence L Miller
Defendant:
Mrs. Cunningham, L Luking, Rebecca Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ratliff
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Rob Jeffreys, J. B. Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Jeffreys et al
as 2:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Michael S Banks
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Wexford Health Sources Inc, LaToya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, C. Rayford and J. Fillinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Nestor Medina
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Felicia Adkins, Dr J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stark, Jr. v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50236
Petitioner:
Ivan J. Stark, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ramos v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ramos
Defendant:
. Gonzalez, Kim .., Jody Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Peterson et al
as 3:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Ashton Daniel
Defendant:
J. Peterson, Daniel Monti, Doctor Aorora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flournoy-Carter v. Sosa et al
as 1:2024cv04969
Plaintiff:
Jesse Flournoy-Carter
Defendant:
F. Sosa and J Klejka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
