Cases 1 - 10 of 43
GARRETT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv04598
Plaintiff:
JACOB TIMOTHY GARRETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS N.J.D.O.C., NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2023cv03753
Petitioner:
RAHEEM JACOBS
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACOBS v. FISHER et al
as 1:2022cv06487
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JACOBS
Defendant:
KEISHA FISHER, NJDOC/S.I.D., SOUTHWOODS PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. CUZZUPE
as 1:2022cv05169
Plaintiff:
JOHN JACOBS, III
Defendant:
JOHN S. CUZZUPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv02434
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JACOBS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, WARDEN KEISHA FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. BERGAMI
as 1:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DONOVAN JACOBS
Defendant:
WARDEN BERGAMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JACOBS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DONOVAN JACOBS
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ and LEUTENANT ANDUJAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
COLLINS v. MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 3:2021cv02034
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN COLLINS
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and OFFICER B. JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2020cv15542
Defendant:
TAMIKA JACOBS, JOHN DOE and MR. NOGAN
Plaintiff:
VAN WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv12454
Plaintiff:
JACOB THOMPSON
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
