Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BRANDT v. HUDSON COUNTY, THOMAS DEGISE et al
as 2:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY, THOMAS DEGISE, ERICA GALE, RYANNA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLAFANA v. BORETZ et al
as 2:2022cv06549
Plaintiff:
YASIN VILLAFANA
Defendant:
STACY BORITV, LAUREN BAYER, REGINA CAULFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDT v. CIRILLO et al
as 2:2022cv03752
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
GUY CIRILLO, TONY BROWN, ANTONIO PIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDT v. OFFICER MORGAN et al
as 2:2022cv03379
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
OFFICER MORGAN, NURSE ALEXIS, ALFARO ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. SANCHOMORA et al
as 3:2013cv02492
Plaintiff:
HORACE WHITE
Defendant:
ELDA SANCHOMORA, GIOVANNI PERRILI, JEFFREY GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDT v. ROSSI et al
as 3:2011cv02627
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE ROSSI, WAVERLY ANDREWS, PIERRE NIGIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANDT v. HOGAN et al
as 3:2010cv04944
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HOGAN, PATRICIA FOUNDAS, BENITO MARTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANDT v. FEIBUSCH et al
as 3:2010cv04223
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
EVAN FEIBUSCH, MARIE CHAMPAGNE, DONALD PATTERSHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. BRANDT et al
as 3:2009cv05367
Defendant:
JOHN BRANDT, TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, LAWRENCE ROSSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLER v. ST. JOSEPH'S MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2008cv00825
Plaintiff:
THABANI MULLER
Defendant:
ST. JOSEPH'S MEDICAL CENTER, HARBOR HOUSE, HENRY KOWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
