Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ZACK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARWICK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BRYAN BARWICK
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Okwor v. State of Florida
as 0:2022cv60979
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Okwor
Defendant:
State of Florida, Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DAVIS v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L DAVIS
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JIMMY PATRONIS and MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L DAVIS
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JIMMY PATRONIS and MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2021cv01943
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Davis
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Jimmy Patronis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Desantis et al
as 8:2020cv00695
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Brian Skoniki, Ron Desantis and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Himes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Poppell et al
as 8:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Chad Poppell, Eric Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Himes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Desantis et al
as 8:2020cv00550
Defendant:
Ron Desantis, Nikki Fried, Jimmy Patronis and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Himes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
