Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robert Jackson v. John Davids, et al
as 24-1616
Defendant:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, individual and official capacity, TRAVIS LAHR, Custody and Correctional Officer, individual and official capacity, JAMES KOTOWICZ and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY JACKSON
Daniel Cook v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1609
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden and HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of the MDOC
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Joel Carter v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1561
Defendant:
CHAD GUILFORD, American's with Disability Act Coordinator, in their official and individual capacity, CARMEN MCINTYRE, MDOC Medical Director, in her official and individual capacity, JOHN DAVIDS, warden, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL MARCEL CARTER
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Defendant:
ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity, NORBERT FRONCZAK, Law Librarian, official and personal capacity, JEFF TANNER, Warden, official and personal capacity, named as J. Tanner and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Ricky Davis, Jr. v. Simon, et al
as 24-1190
Plaintiff:
RICKY ANTONIO DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
[UNKNOWN] SIMON, Officer/PC/HI, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Demareo Allen v. John Davids
as 24-1015
Petitioner:
DEMAREO JAMAINE ALLEN
Respondent:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden
Stephen Getter v. John Davids
as 23-1948
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN ROBERT GETTER
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden
Lawrence Stafford v. John Davids
as 23-1923
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE STAFFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden
Robert Hackney v. John Davids
as 23-1869
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL HACKNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden
Cruz Hinds v. John Davids
as 23-1418
Petitioner / Appellant:
CRUZ DEVON HINDS
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, Ionia Maximun Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
