Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Holguin v. Las Vegas NM State Facility et al
as 1:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Pedro Nicholas Holguin
Defendant:
Las Vegas NM State Facility, MHTC, Social Security Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williford v. Ballard et al
as 2:2022cv00856
Petitioner:
Jonathon Williford
Respondent:
Ben Ballard, Judge Van Dyke and Judge Kelli Calicoate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joseph v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Star Joseph
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Federal Court District of New Mexico, United States Federal Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Garza et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
Donald Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
Carmen E. Garza, Laura Fashing, Martha Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
Star Joseph
Defendant:
William P. Johnson, Kevin R. Sweazea, Kea W. Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00895
Plaintiff:
Star Joseph
Defendant:
William P Johnson, Kevin R. Sweazea, Kea W. Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aspaas v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01109
Defendant:
FNU Fike, George Zoley, New Mexico Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Judge Aspaas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tercero v. Eggleston et al
as 2:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Roque Aranda Tercero
Defendant:
Jill Eggleston, DHS/ICE Office of the Chief Counsel and "IJ" Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. William Richardson et al
as 1:2010cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
William Richardson, U.S. District Judges of El Paso, Texas, District Attorney's Office of El Paso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
