Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SNIPES v. PASSAIC COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv14149
Plaintiff:
SHAQUAN SNIPES
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY, PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, OFFICE OF THE PASSAIC COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELOUS v. GANNON, et al
as 2:2019cv06186
Defendant:
ILYA BELOUS, Sergeant JOHN DOE DAVIDSECK, Dr. JOHN DOE AND NURSES JANE DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parness v. Hort et al
as 2:2017cv04029
Plaintiff:
MARTIN S. PARNESS
Defendant:
MICHAEL HORT, SUSAN HORT, JOHN DOES 1-75 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENTHALL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25
as 2:2015cv03351
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BENTHALL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARUANNO v. VELEZ et al
as 2:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-25, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESCOBAR v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv02497
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL ESCOBAR
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MONTELEONE, GAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACOSTA v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv02215
Plaintiff:
RUBEN ACOSTA
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MONTELEONE, GAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARUANNO v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2011cv01842
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, MERRILL MAIN and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARUANNO v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2011cv01151
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, MERRILL MAIN and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GATSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv05606
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GATSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE, KIM GUADANO, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
