Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomas Lewis v. Alan Greason, et al
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEROY LEWIS
Defendant:
ALAN GREASON, Assistant Warden, REGINA JENKINS-GRANT, Unit Manager, JENNIFER TORRES, Transfer Coordinator and others
Philip Berryman v. George Stephenson, et al
as 22-1971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE STEPHENSON, in his individual and official capacity jointly and severally, KRISTOPHER STEECE, in his individual and official capacity jointly and severally, ALAN GREASON, in his individual and official capacity jointly and severally and others
Burrell Clark, et al v. Andrea Owens, et al
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BURRELL CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREA OWENS, OPT Mental Health Case Manager, LISA WALSH, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, REGINA JENKINS-GRANT, Resident Unit Manager and others
Parker v. Jenkins-Grant et al
as 2:2021cv10467
Defendant:
Wisner, Frost, Purdom and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
LaPine v. Booth et al
as 3:2020cv12423
Defendant:
Lisa West, Carmen McIntyre, Hinijosa and others
Plaintiff:
Darrin LaPine
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Washington et al
as 2:2019cv10247
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meeks
Defendant:
R. Jenkins-Grant, Gretten, Bridges and others
Burley v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv12239
Plaintiff:
Edward Donald Burley
Defendant:
Randall Haas, S. Williams, George Stephenson and others
Berryman et al v. Haas et al
as 2:2018cv10833
Plaintiff:
Philip Berryman and Albert L. Lee
Defendant:
R. Haas, George Stephenson, Regina Jenkins-Grant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
