Cases 1 - 10 of 150
POSLIGUA v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv22337
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALBEY CASTRO POSLIGUA
Respondent:
MRS. S. THOMPSON, JENNIFER ORDONEZ and A. ACEVEDO-SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BACON v. KNOPHF
as 1:2022cv06867
Plaintiff:
JOEL BACON
Defendant:
JENNIFER KNOPHF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, ARRESTING OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASQUERELLO et al v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2021cv18806
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER PASQUERELLO and MICHELLE ANGELINA
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, FORMER COMMISSIONER MARCUS O. HICKS, ACTING COMMISSIONER VICTORIA KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MCRAE et al
as 1:2021cv14143
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BROWN
Defendant:
JENNIFER WEBB MCRAE, PTLM SANTIAGO and RODNEY YAMASAKI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2020cv03183
Defendant:
JENNIFER FARESTAD, ANTHONY THOMAS, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC HINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
FRAZIER v. BONDS et al
as 1:2018cv16774
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DR. SHERITA COLLIER, WILLIE BONDS and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL H. FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
