Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AHMAD v. HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2015cv08994
Plaintiff:
MUSADDIQ AHMAD
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE, NORMAN DOUGLAS GLOVER, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv05201
Plaintiff:
JESSICA C. GRAHAM
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv05236
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRADLEY
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. R. KILROY, J. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2012cv01048
Plaintiff:
JEROME HOLMES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, THE JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. D. BURGESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2011cv05731
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GLOVER
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, CITY OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROURK v. CHOWANEC et al
as 2:2011cv02772
Plaintiff:
AHMAD ROURK
Defendant:
WALTER CHOWANEC, COSTIGAN, SCANLON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. JOHN DOE 1-25 et al
as 2:2011cv01395
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH CLARK
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-25 and JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOURDINE v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2007cv06155
Plaintiff:
SHAUN GOURDINE
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, J. CIESLAK, A. YANNI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARULLE v. AMRSTRONG et al
as 2:2007cv03416
Plaintiff:
LOUIS GARULLE
Defendant:
KEITH AMRSTRONG, MARC LAVELLE and JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
