Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TORRES v. JOHN DOE 1-3
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. TORRES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARLEY v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2022cv04385
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL HARLEY
Defendant:
DIRECTOR ORTIZ, WARDEN CIRILLO, NURSE ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2021cv05200
Plaintiff:
LUIS GARCIA
Defendant:
OFFICER JEFFREY ROBINSON and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUNDTREE v. SANTIAGO et al
as 1:2020cv20744
Defendant:
OFC. STADE, OFC. CRANEY, OFC. MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv16283
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY NEW JERSEY, COLONEL JOSEPH FUENTES, COLONEL JUSTIN J. DINTINO and others
Plaintiff:
EVERTON BARTLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv12826
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D PERKINS
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, BOROUGH OF S. HACKENSACK, STEVEN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. IBE et al
as 1:2018cv12543
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3, CHIGOZIE IBE, IDC, BURLEW, R&D and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MUHAMMAD v. MACK et al
as 1:2018cv03452
Plaintiff:
YUSUF ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
G. MACK, P. MILLER, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. CITY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2017cv00788
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF BURLINGTON, OFFICER WOOLEY, RAHEEM DIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRICKLAND v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2015cv01526
Plaintiff:
BRUCE STRICKLAND
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON , STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
