Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DEMOS v. JACKSON
as 1:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMOS v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02381
Respondent:
WASHINGTON, D.C., STATE OF WASHINGTON and U.S.A.
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHEPHARD v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv01810
Defendant:
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., DICK CHENEY, SHERROD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHARD v. GRAHAM et al
as 1:2017cv02853
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
LINDSEY GRAHAM, DICK DURBIN, PATRICK LEAHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, C. THOMAS, KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. STATE OF WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2017cv00203
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv02444
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEMOS, JR. v. STATE OF WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2015cv00758
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEMOS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
