Cases 1 - 10 of 1,161
Pena v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Mandela Jones
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Jon Loftos and Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Spencer et al
as 3:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Jones
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Spencer, J. Saddler and J. Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner:
Daniel Amaya
Respondent:
Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fukama-Kabika v. Jones
as 2:2024cv02091
Petitioner:
Jean A Fukama-Kabika
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Henze et al
as 1:2024cv02752
Plaintiff:
Omarrian Jones and I.M.
Defendant:
Henze, Velapinto, Steven Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
