Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16606
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Lucy KOH
as 22-16600
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCY H. KOH
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2022cv06946
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr. and Laura Mae Roushion Simmons
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, Brian Cates, Bailor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 2:2021cv06671
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Kathleen Allison and HDSP Warden B. Kibler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC)Simmons v. Wuerth et al
as 2:2019cv01344
Defendant:
J. Wuerth and R. Heise
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv00798
Respondent:
Scott Kernan, Kathleen Allison, State of CA and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Simmons v. State of California et al
as 1:2019cv00114
Respondent:
Scott Kernan, Kathleen Allison, State of California and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Scott Kernan
as 18-16201
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 18-16203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., SCOTT KERNAN, DAVID BAUGHMAN and others
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. State of California, et al
as 18-16202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden and Chief Executive Officer CSP Sacramento, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Director CDCR and Adult Institutions and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
