Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Henderson v. Judy Scott
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2015cv02343
Petitioner:
Debra Ruth Henderson
Respondent:
Judy Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor-Ogier v. Bell et al
as 5:2014cv00891
Defendant:
Oliver J. Bell, Sally Bridges, Sally Bridges and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A. Taylor-Ogier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grogan v. State Of Texas
as 6:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Michael Dena Grogan
Defendant:
Monica McCornmick, B. Parker, Warden Judy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Scott et al
as 6:2014cv00084
Defendant:
C/O FNU Arey, C/O FNU Raditz, C/O FNU Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Antrainette Y. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Thaler et al
as 6:2013cv00273
Petitioner:
Dorissa Collins
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Warden Judy Scott
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilburn v. Thaler et al
as 6:2013cv00094
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Warden Judy Scott and Rick Thaler
Petitioner:
Pamela Diann Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. Scott et al
as 6:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Bertha Renee Burleson
Defendant:
Joseph LaCroix, Cheryl Lawson and Judy Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burleson v. Scott et al
as 6:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bertha Renee Burleson
Defendant:
Judy Scott, Cheryl Lawson and Joseph LaCroix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marston v. Livingston et al
as 5:2008cv00570
Plaintiff:
Catherine L. Marston
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Gilbert Campuzano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.