Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Webb-EL v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-EL
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and I. Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Malik v. Reed College et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Shazad Malik
Defendant:
Reed College, John Young Taft, Kater Murch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01880
Petitioner:
Myron Keith Carter
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carter v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01757
Petitioner:
Myron Keith Carter
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burford v. McCahill et al
as 6:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Clayton Dean Burford
Defendant:
Conor McCahill, Keith Stein and Circuit Court of Oregon of Linn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hirt v. Director ODOC
as 3:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Patrick Keith Hirt
Respondent:
Director ODOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Keith Charles Harrison
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix and John and Jane Does 1-99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00574
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Forbess v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Steven Charles Forbess
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Warren Roberts, Dr. Garth Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00789
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
