Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jensen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Kent Jensen
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cobb v. Haddon et al
as 2:2018cv00975
Defendant:
Larry Benzon, FNU Welch, FNU Blackburn and others
Undetermined:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Brent Mayon Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2017cv00986
Plaintiff:
Richard Norman Stein
Defendant:
State of Utah, McKay Dee Hospital, FNU Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Lubeck et al
as 2:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Dexter Paris Davis
Defendant:
Bruce Lubeck, Matthew J. Hansen, Matthew A. Barraza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Baxter et al
as 2:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hansen
Defendant:
John Baxter, FNU Kent and Central Utah Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Wilson et al
as 2:2011cv00012
Defendant:
Ron Wilson and Stephanie Eberle
Plaintiff:
Tim Kent Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00836
Petitioner:
Craig Kent Gordon
Respondent:
State of Utah, Judge FNU Ludlow and Judge FNU Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00800
Petitioner:
Craig Kent Gordon
Respondent:
State of Utah, FNU Walton and FNU Ludlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00713
Petitioner:
Craig Kent Gordon
Defendant:
State of Utah and Eric Ludlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Ludlow et al
as 2:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Craig Kent Gordon
Defendant:
Eric Ludlow, FNU Shumate, Washington County Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
