Cases 1 - 10 of 114
WRIGHT III v. ESPOSITO
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT III
Defendant:
KAREN ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. FORRESTER et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMAR GRAHAM, JR
Defendant:
KAREN FORRESTER, EMANUAL HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2023cv24167
Plaintiff:
Karen Xiomara Williams
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMPSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, JASON BRENES-CATINCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Venuto et al
as 5:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Julian Anderson
Defendant:
Gary Venuto, Karen Mercaldo, Simona Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hatton
as 3:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Jones
Defendant:
Karen D. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyree et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C. A. Tyree, Gwava, T. McDarby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv21968
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Mike Pence, Karen Boyd and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Cheatham, et al
as 5:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham, J. Taylor, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Downing v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brian L Downing
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Manuel Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
