Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Goggins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
as 3:2023cv01493
Petitioner:
Bryan Keefe Goggins, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOYOLA v. CHUTKAN et al
as 2:2023cv14300
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL LOYOLA
Defendant:
TANA CHUTKAN, Ron DeSantis, MOISHE MANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Massard v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv81228
Plaintiff:
Christian Massard
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Geo Care, Sgt. Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WATTS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS JAIL et al
as 3:2022cv10879
Plaintiff:
JR ROBERT LEE WATTS and ROBERT LEE WATTS, JR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS JAIL and KEEFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEAVY v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2020cv05842
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, THOMPSON, ARAMARK/KEEFE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDRE PEAVY and MIKHAIL IMAN MUSTAQIM AL-QUADI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. INCH et al
as 5:2019cv00407
Defendant:
MARK INCH, KEEFE GROUP, GEO GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00282
Defendant:
MARK INCH, GEO GROUP INC, TRINITY SERVICES GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA B WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oyola v. Keefe Group
as 6:2018cv01181
Plaintiff:
Miguel Oyola
Defendant:
Keefe Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Micko v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv21242
Plaintiff:
George Micko
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones and Keefe Commissary Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, ACCESS CORRECTIONS, TRINITY SERVICES GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
