Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Roderick Washington v. Shen Jay Fern et al
as 2:2024cv02933
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Shen Jay Fern, Laura Priver, Madeline Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Fregi et al
as 3:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Matthew Fregi and John Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onofre Serrano v. R. Bar et al
as 2:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Onofre Tommy Serrano
Defendant:
R. Bar, Casey Charles Mulholland, D Angelo Jerome Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Super. Ct.
as 3:2023cv05799
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas and Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Superior Court of Martinez, Judge Horimoto, Judge Tharesa Canepa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Perkins v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Rayshawn Perkins
Defendant:
C. Kennedy, J. Delucchi, J. Fleshman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harris et al v. Curry et al
as 1:2021cv01452
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris, Kennedy Robinson and Adam E.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Curry, Correctional Officer Sanchize and Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harper v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Seth Harper
Defendant:
David Robinson, David Putnam, Crystal Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Khademi v. South Placer County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv01498
Plaintiff:
Davood Khademi
Defendant:
South Placer County Jail, Wooden, C. Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Fitzgerald Kennedy v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2021cv03869
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.