Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Guerrero Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jose Jr. Guerrero Lozano and Jose Guerrero Lozano, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Jose G Lozano
Respondent:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, K. Bouza, L. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickett v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, D. Canady, J. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jose G Lozano
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 1:2023cv20892
Plaintiff:
Jose G Lozano
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. Collier County Sheriff Kevin Rambosk
as 2:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Stephen Dennis Schroeder
Respondent:
Collier County Sheriff Kevin Rambosk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nash v. Naples Jail Center et al
as 2:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
John Edward Nash
Defendant:
Naples Jail Center, Armor Correctional Health, Dr. Janet Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
John Taylor Morris, III
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Keith Harmon, Dareece Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2020cv00585
Defendant:
Robert Striker, FNU Gable, Daniel Pino and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
