Cases 1 - 10 of 502
Jones v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Jones
Defendant:
D. Williams and Lt. Spradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Rashane L. Jones
Defendant:
James Brown, R. Osteen, R. Hynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELVEY v. JONES
as 5:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
HEATH LEE HELVEY
Defendant:
DWAYNE L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01135
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Hatton
as 3:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Jones
Defendant:
Karen D. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Wiley et al
as 8:2022cv02159
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Corporal Wiley, Deputy Statsny, Corporal Brinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Gary Bell
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Julie L. Jones, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hail v. Dixon et al
as 8:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
M. J. Christian Hail
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, State of Florida, Mark S. Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Deloach et al
as 3:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Jones
Defendant:
Sgt. Walter S. Deloach, Correctional Officer Carlton, P. D. Carty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
