Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Whitall v. Munk et al
as 3:2020cv03415
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richard Whitall
Defendant:
Rafael Chuapoco, Vaun C Munk, S. Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. CCI, et al.
as 1:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Brian Applegate
Defendant:
CCI, CCHCS, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Yates et al
as 1:2012cv00717
Plaintiff:
Kenaz Dumah Parker
Defendant:
James A. Yates, Felix Igbinosa, David I. Rohrdanz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 2:2011cv09123
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Intervenor:
S. Baek, S. Dado, G. Hinkle and others
Defendant:
Bush, Matthew Cates, B. Flores and others
Unknown:
David A. Carrillo, Samantha H. Ramsey, Samantha H. Ramsey and others
916) 324-5205 (fax:
James Edmund Flynn, Constance Lee Picciano, Constance Lee Picciano and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
T. Nguyen, C. Russ, Spotted Eagle Circle and others
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
530) 752-5788 (fax:
Carter Capps White
Kenaz Dumah Parker v. James A. Yates, et al.
as 1:2011cv00802
Plaintiff:
Kenaz Dumah Parker
Defendant:
James A. Yates, F. Igbinosa, David I. Rohrdanz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2010cv01466
Plaintiff:
Bobby White
Defendant:
L. Nguyen and Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Igbinosa et al
as 1:2010cv01187
Plaintiff:
David A Elliott
Defendant:
Felix Igbinosa, J. Walker and L. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen Nguyen v. Ben Curry, et al
as 09-16807
Petitioner - Appellant:
NGUYEN L. NGUYEN
Respondent - Appellee:
BEN CURRY and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Nguyen v. Horel et al
as 4:2007cv01434
Petitioner:
Nguyen L. Nguyen
Respondent:
Robert A. Horel and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
