Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Johnson v. Neel et al
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
C. Neel, C. Burnett, Nunes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soanes v. Maddox et al
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Keith Soanes
Defendant:
M. Maddox, Christina Price, P. Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv20600
Plaintiff:
TYWON L THOMPSON
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Ron DeSantis, Jeffrey R. McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turem v. Florida State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv01442
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Turem
Defendant:
Florida State Prison, L. Thompson, R. McGregor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boobyyaa v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Mandingo Boobyyaa and Keith Mason
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, T. Campbell, Major Dedge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv14169
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Thompson
Defendant:
State of Florida and Ken Mascara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Don Davis, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hall et al
as 3:2020cv01125
Defendant:
William R. Hall, L. Thompson, A. McGregor and others
Plaintiff:
Devandal Bernard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRONG v SKIGEN, et al
as 3:2019cv04822
Defendant:
MICHELLE SCHOUEST, W SANTIAGO MIRANDA, A SKIGEN and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
