Cases 1 - 10 of 341
Bunn v. Robertson, et al
as 4:2024cv06541
Defendant:
James Robertson, Pelican Bay State Prison, Director of CDCR and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lamont Bunn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Lamont Bunn, Jr v. T. L. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv07767
Defendant:
T. L. Campbell, C.O. Medina and J. Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Gary Lamont Bunn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bunn v. Robertson et al
as 2:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Gary Lamont Bunn, Jr
Defendant:
Pelican Bay State Prison, James Robertson, Robert Losacco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Sigler v. Prudhel
as 1:2024cv00762
Respondent:
Josh Prudhel
Petitioner:
Jeff Lamonte Sigler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Sigler v. Prudhel
as 2:2024cv01840
Respondent:
Josh Prudhel
Petitioner:
Jeff Lamonte Sigler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Velton Lamont Boone v. Gena Jones
as 2:2024cv05665
Petitioner:
Velton Lamont Boone
Respondent:
Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Crossley v. Arya
as 2:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
Lamont Crossley
Defendant:
Arya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Shepard v. Gannon et al
as 1:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Lamont Shepard
Defendant:
S. Gannon, S. Levingson and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaunte Lamont Johnson Sr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2023cv01968
Petitioner:
Shaunte Lamont Johnson, Sr.
Respondent:
Ms. Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Adkins v. Schultz et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Defendant:
J. Schultz, D. Richardson, B. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
