Cases 1 - 10 of 28
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. MORRIS
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN P. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAWSON
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2022cv04340
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAWSON
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, DIR. OSCAR AVILES, LT. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. CALDWELL
as 1:2022cv01324
Petitioner:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Respondent:
WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAWSON v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, ARRESTING OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
ERIC LAWSON
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN and OSCAR VILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. LAWSON et al
as 3:2021cv19614
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. SMITH
Defendant:
JUDGE LAWRENCE M. LAWSON and COURT CLERK JANE G. CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WARREN
as 1:2021cv10732
Respondent:
WARDEN CHARLES WARREN
Petitioner:
CHARLES ALEX LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
