Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Williams v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01695
Defendant:
Rick Coursey, Michael Gower, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Ferry v. Michael Gower, et al
as 17-35139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD FERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL GOWER, Assistant Director, ODOC, JEFF PREMO, Superintendent, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General and others
Padgett v. Byerly et al
as 6:2016cv00798
Defendant:
Captain Alvis, Sgt. Arnoux, T. Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2015cv02390
Defendant:
Victor Beerbower, Lt. Boston, Jill Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perryman v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2015cv00554
Defendant:
M Bennett, Joe Capps, Mike Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Perryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2015cv00102
Defendant:
Casey Cleaver, John/Jane Doe, C/O Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cremeen v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00721
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, John and Jane Doe, S. Farrow and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Cremeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perryman v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00719
Defendant:
SGT. Aconda, Sgt. Bauer, Lt. Burchett and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Perryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Perryman v. James Deacon, et al
as 14-35224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS PERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DEACON, STEVE FRANKE, LEONARD WILLIAMSON and others
Cufaude v. Nooth et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Defendant:
J. Bell, L. Braun, Coombs and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cufaude
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
