Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McLaughin v. Livingston County PD et al
as 6:2024cv06314
Plaintiff:
Casey McLaughin, Sr.
Defendant:
Livingston County PD and L. Babeswski Laslo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Livingston County Jail
as 6:2022cv06422
Plaintiff:
Justin Adam Byrd
Defendant:
Livingston County Jail, Zach Scott, Deputy Fennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donoteo-Reyes v. Livingston County Jail et al
as 6:2020cv06250
Defendant:
US Marshals and Livingston County Jail
Plaintiff:
Everardo Donoteo-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 9:2017cv01214
Plaintiff:
Edwin Guzman
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe(s), Livingston County and The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampel v. Livingston County Jail et al
as 6:2017cv06548
Plaintiff:
Juan Sampel
Defendant:
Livingston County Jail, Aguirre, Erin Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Livingston County et al
as 6:2016cv06773
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Townsend, Sr.
Defendant:
Livingston County, Brandan J. Flickner, "John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinton v. Livingston County et al
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Swinton, Jr.
Defendant:
Livingston County, Livingston County Jail, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Livingston County, New York et al
as 6:2014cv06593
Plaintiff:
Brian T. Barrett
Defendant:
Livingston County, New York, Thomas J. Dougherty, Randall S. Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Livingston County
as 6:2014cv06260
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Harris
Defendant:
Livingston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberites v. Huff et al
as 1:2011cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Roberites
Defendant:
Ron Jr. Huff, Kane, Kim Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
