Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MEJIA-SOTO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv08772
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ERNESTO MEJIA-SOTO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MEJIA-BUSTAMANTE v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08545
Respondent:
MS. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
JUAN GUILLERMO MEJIA-BUSTAMANTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTINEZ-MEJIA v. SOMERSET COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND COUNTY OFFICIALS
as 3:2022cv05816
Plaintiff:
JOSE Y. MARTINEZ-MEJIA
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND COUNTY OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONQUEST v. CITY OF TRENTON POLICE DEPT et al
as 3:2018cv06068
Plaintiff:
RALPH CONQUEST
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON POLICE DEPT, DOGGET, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEJIAS v. NELSEN et al
as 2:2014cv05875
Petitioner:
RUBEN MEJIAS
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEREZ-MEJIAS v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07836
Petitioner:
RAMON PEREZ-MEJIAS
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MEJIA v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2011cv00937
Plaintiff:
DIEGO FERNANDO MEJIA
Defendant:
MR. ORTIZ, MS. LONG, MR. DALESSANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEJIA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv03970
Petitioner:
JUAN ALBERTO MEJIA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MEJIA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2007cv01645
Petitioner:
AURELIO MEJIA
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
