Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Natty v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2011cv00093
Petitioner:
Therese Veronica Natty
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Charles Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Narcisse v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2009cv00718
Petitioner:
Yves Narcisse
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and David Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Gustave v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00041
Petitioner:
Patrick Gustave
Respondent:
United States of America, Frank Sizer, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Gozo v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv00101
Petitioner:
Makushamari Gozo
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and Raymond Simonse
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prasad v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv01337
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Raymond Simonse and others
Plaintiff:
Suresh Prasad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Badimu v. Simonse et al
as 1:2008cv01339
Petitioner:
Kabalu Kabasele Badimu
Respondent:
Raymond A. Simonse, David Venturella and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Montero v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2008cv00012
Petitioner:
Claudio Montero
Respondent:
Attorney General, Michael Chertoff, Michael J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
John v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2007cv03057
Petitioner:
Jaromir William John
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Raymond A. Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02968
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
