Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Lee
Defendant:
Matt Smith, Woodford County Illinois, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Miller v. John Davids, et al
as 22-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden, in their individual and official capacities and others
Nigel Whittaker v. Michael Curley
as 17-1040
Petitioner - Appellant:
NIGEL WHITTAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden
Thomas Young v. Michael Curley
as 16-2385
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS ALFRED YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden
Terrence Darby v. Shane Place, et al
as 16-2278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE BERNARD DARBY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANE PLACE, Warden, THOMAS MACKIE, Warden, DANIEL LESATZ, Deputy Warden and others
Edward Cromer v. Bill Schuette, et al
as 15-1989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES CROMER
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL SCHUETTE, named on complaint as Attorney General, City of Detroit, County of Wayne, BRUCE U. MORROW, Judge, KIM HILL, Guard and others
Terrence Taylor v. Michael Curley
as 15-1434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE LEE TAYLOR, aka Terrance Lee Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden
Kevin Briggs v. Michael Curley
as 15-1251
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN DEVON BRIGGS, names as Kevin Devon Briggs, Sr., on petition
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden, Warden
Edward Cromer v. Bill Schuette, et al
as 14-2012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES CROMER
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL SCHUETTE, named on complaint as Attorney General, City of Detroit, County of Wayne, BRUCE U. MORROW, Judge, KIM HILL, Guard and others
Robert Becker v. Michael Curley
as 13-2189
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT BECKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
