Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Delgado v. Annucci et al
as 6:2020cv06228
Defendant:
Corrections Sergeant G. Hill, Mark . Taylor, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavis v. Skretny et al
as 1:2019cv00181
Defendant:
D. Moose, Ms. E. White, Ms. A. Felker and others
Plaintiff:
George Chavis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agee v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2019cv00057
Defendant:
Mr. Anthony J. Annucci, John/Jane Doe(s) #4, Joseph Bellnier and others
Plaintiff:
Jkendric Jirelle Agee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gatson v. Bergen County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2015cv03795
Defendant:
Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, County of Bergen, Honorable Liliana A. DeaVila-Silebi, PJ.CR and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Tokyo Gatson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClenic v. Shmettan et al
as 2:2015cv00705
Defendant:
Mr. Joseph Albergo, Nassau County Correctional Center, Nassau County Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Daryle D. McClenic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Batista v. The State of New York Suffolk County et al
as 2:2013cv02862
Plaintiff:
Julian Antonio Batista
Defendant:
C.O., Mr. John Doe, Ms. John Doe, Mr. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florio v. Canty et al
as 1:2012cv08348
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Florio
Defendant:
Canty, Area Deputy Mr. John Doe, Area Captain Mr. Jonh Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
