Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Brown et al v. Suffolk County Police Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv06636
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Brown, Henry Mulligan and Chrispher Brandl
Defendant:
Suffolk County Police Dept., "Officers & Sgt. "etc", Phillips Osten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aziz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Muhammad A. Aziz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Eugene (Gene) A. Roberts, William (Bill) Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jewell v. Mulligan et al
as 7:2022cv02693
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jewell
Defendant:
Daniel Mulligan, Peter Link, Michel Blot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chavis v. Korobkova et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Edwin Uzu, Yelena Korobkova, Robert V. Bentivegua and others
Plaintiff:
Katron Chavis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borders El Bey v. Doe #31 et al
as 6:2017cv06565
Plaintiff:
Michael Borders El Bey
Defendant:
John Doe #31, John Doe #32, Marianne Yaru and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abreu v. Bruen et al
as 6:2017cv06394
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin Bruen, Nancy J. Heywood, John C. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Griffin
as 6:2015cv06502
Petitioner:
Edwin Mulligan
Respondent:
Thomas Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv09500
Petitioner:
Patrick Baker
Respondent:
Jeh Johnson, Christopher Shanahan, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Yando et al
as 9:2013cv01279
Plaintiff:
Skyler Jackson
Defendant:
Nathan Yando, Roger Morgan, Colin Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
