Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv01696
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, TODD PERKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SMITH
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, T. OUTLAW, O'DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03241
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
DAVID HALL CRUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AJAYI v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01019
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MURIEL BOWSER, PETER NEWSHAM and others
Plaintiff:
OLUWASHOLA OLANIYI AJAYI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRVING v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv03818
Plaintiff:
LEONITE IRVING
Defendant:
QUINCY L. BOOTH, JOHN DOE, MURIEL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2016cv02261
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ELBERT GRIFFIN, DOUGLAS CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENNEGHAN et al v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2016cv00569
Plaintiff:
GERALD HENNEGHAN and THADDEUS HENNEGHAN
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RAYMOND DAVIDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALLOY v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2015cv00583
Plaintiff:
GERALD J. MALLOY
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, D.C. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
