Cases 1 - 10 of 147
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Flagler County)
as 3:2023cv01012
Petitioner:
Clarence E. Murphy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ST CLAIR v. KEEN et al
as 4:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST CLAIR, JR
Defendant:
KEEN, CPT 1, CPT 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ANDREWS
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MURPHY
Defendant:
TRACY ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURPHY v. ROCA et al
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
JAVAR CHARLES MURPHY
Defendant:
C ROCA, BLASSY, D LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. SUMPTER et al
as 3:2023cv09073
Plaintiff:
JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant:
KENNETH SUMPTER, DERRICK PURVIS and LARRY MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2023cv04232
Petitioner:
GREGORY EARL MURPHY, SR
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 3:2022cv25412
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE WHITE
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, C PALEN, MAURICE D MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
