Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2016cv24502
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prison , Thomas R. Kane, H.J. Marberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkney v. United States Justice Department et al
as 5:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Tracy Pinkney
Defendant:
United States Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dent v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joe Zimmerman, Helen J. Marberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAGER v. AUGUSTINE
as 5:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
DONALD W RAGER
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, KEITH BUFORD, S MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zone v. Marberry et al
as 5:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwan Zone
Defendant:
Helen J. Marberry, Tamyra Jarvis and B. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEXTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
KEITH JAMES SEXTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER, CHARLES E SAMUELS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITNEY v. WALKER
as 5:2013cv00347
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WHITNEY
Defendant:
WALKER, UNKNOWN, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Samuels et al.
as 5:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harley G. Lappin, Scott A. Middlebrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Denooyer v. Pastrana et al
as 5:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Todd Denooyer
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, J. Acebal, Sarah Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denooyer v. Pastrana et al
as 6:2013cv01164
Plaintiff:
Todd Denooyer
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, J. Acebal, Sarah Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
