Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrion v. Janes et al
as 1:2009cv01437
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Carrion
Respondent:
Linda Janes, Joy Reid and Marc Dann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boussum v. Collins et al
as 2:2008cv00770
Plaintiff:
Charles E Boussum
Defendant:
Terry Collins, Gary Croft, Harry Hageman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Corns v. Reinbold et al
as 5:2008cv01743
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Corns
Defendant:
Richard D. Reinbold, Jr., John D. Ferrero, Jr., Marc Dann and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smallwood v. Collins et al
as 2:2008cv00679
Plaintiff:
Sherman Smallwood
Defendant:
Terry Collins, Gary Croft, Harry Hageman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Palmer v. United States et al
as 1:2008cv00790
Plaintiff:
David Dayton Palmer
Defendant:
United States, State of Ohio, Marc Dann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Court of Common Pleas, Stark County, et al.
as 5:2008cv00686
Petitioner:
Paul D Lowe
Respondent:
Court of Common Pleas, Stark County, Ohio and Marc Dann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harsh et al v. Knab et al
as 2:2008cv00280
Plaintiff:
Robert Harsh, Percy Abernathy and Brian Wofford
Defendant:
Robin Knab, Leah Bob-Itt, Timothy Brunsman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harsh et al v. Knab et al
as 1:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Robert Harsh, Percy Abernathy and Brian Wofford
Defendant:
Robin Knab, Leah Bob-Itt, Timothy Brunsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
