Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Pegese v. USA
as 5:2022cv01335
Petitioner:
Marion Pegese
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Bell et al
as 9:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Braxton and Obed
Defendant:
Holland, A. Merriman, E. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maupin v. Suffolk County
as 2:2018cv05234
Plaintiff:
Marion Maupin
Defendant:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Zion et al
as 1:2018cv05828
Plaintiff:
James Earl Goodson
Defendant:
A.B.A. John Doe, Attorney Mrs. Marion Zion and The People of The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tingman v. United States of America
as 7:2018cv02566
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Marion Tingman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Massey-Smith et al v. Abassey et al
as 6:2018cv06036
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Antonio Massey-Smith, Marion Eydith Glass and Ariel Whitney Hackett
Defendant:
Abassey, Bataglia, Winchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Rikers Island et al
as 1:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Smith
Defendant:
Rikers Island, Brown, Marion Eydth Glass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Nassau County Mineola Supreme Court et al
as 2:2018cv00211
Defendant:
Garden City Police, Marion Eydth Glass, Areel Whitney Hackett and others
Plaintiff:
Jibreel Hasseen Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heffley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv10033
Plaintiff:
Travis Heffley
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Psychology Department - USP Marion, Psychology Department - FTC Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
