Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Falls v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv08743
Petitioner:
Raiquan K. Falls
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci, Carl E. DuBois and Jude T. Martini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Falls v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv08055
Petitioner:
Raiquan K. Falls
Respondent:
Acting Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci, Carl E. DuBois and Jude T. Martini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edo v. Martiny
as 1:2017cv04094
Plaintiff:
Enekan Edo
Defendant:
Detective Ronald Martiny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edo v. Martini et al
as 1:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Enekan Edo
Defendant:
Detective Gallegher, Detective Martini and Jacquline Rizk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Edo v. Martini et al
as 1:2014cv09235
Plaintiff:
Enekan Edo
Defendant:
Martini, Gallegher and Jacquline Rizk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staton v. Martiny et al
as 1:2013cv06236
Defendant:
Detective Scott Carson, P.O. Martiny, Police Commissioner and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Staton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCray et al v. New York State et al
as 1:2013cv04766
Plaintiff:
Cerious McCray and Kimberly Casanova
Defendant:
New York State, State Commission of Correction (SCOC), Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton v. Martiny et al
as 1:2013cv04090
Plaintiff:
Darren Staton
Defendant:
Martiny, Carson, Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Singleton v. 10 unwarranted U.S. Marshal ET AL. et al
as 1:2012cv03960
Defendant:
10 unwarranted U.S. Marshal ET AL., Ms. J.D. Austin, Mr. T.M. Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
