Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Maske v. Chappell, et al
as 10-1176
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY CHAPPELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2010cv00834
Petitioner:
Jerry Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maske, vs. Chappell, et al
as 1:2010cv00618
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2010cv00473
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2010cv00068
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell
as 09-1538
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY CHAPPELL
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2009cv02754
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell, et al
as 09-1438
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY CHAPPELL and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2009cv02188
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2009cv02164
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.