Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Batton v. Dimmer et al
as 1:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
Mario Batton
Defendant:
D Dimmer, A. Zarate, P. Permejo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hernandez-Mata v. USA
as 3:2023cv01386
Petitioner:
Mauricio Hernandez-Mata
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnny Mata v. Sean Moore
as 2:2022cv08039
Petitioner:
JOHNNY C MATA and Johnny Mata
Respondent:
Facility Captain Sean Moore and Sean Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnny Mata v. Sean Moore
as 2:2022cv07827
Petitioner:
JOHNNY C MATA
Respondent:
Facility Captain Sean Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parsons v. San Jose Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv04691
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
San Jose Police Department, Santa Clara County, William Todd Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Mata et al
as 2:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. J. Mata, Tactical Team Force Member 1, Tactical Team Force Member 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Broque Anthony Anderson v. R. Orewyler et al
as 5:2021cv02168
Plaintiff:
Broque Anthony Anderson
Defendant:
R. Orewyler, Deputy Mata, R. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Sloan v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2021cv01477
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sloan, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, Erik Bidinger-Boggess, R. Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cruz v. Mata et al
as 1:2021cv01162
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
T. Mata, N. Narvaiz, J. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Batton v. Zarate et al
as 1:2021cv00571
Defendant:
P. Permejo, M. Mata, A. Zarate and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Batton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
