Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Ryan M. Marshall v. L. Mejia et al
as 5:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Marshall
Defendant:
L. Mejia and The Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kendrid v. David et al
as 2:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Forrest Kendrid
Defendant:
David, C. Silverman, Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Mejia et al
as 3:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Marshall
Defendant:
L. Mejia and The Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chavez v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Chavez
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre, Mitchell Knedler, Darrow Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bailey v. Mejia et al
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bailey
Defendant:
R. Mejia, J. Martinez, D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Mejia v. Allen
as 2:2023cv02823
Petitioner:
Geronimo Mejia
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Govind v. State of California et al
as 5:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Govind
Defendant:
State of California, California Institution For Men, James S. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reeves v. Diesslin et al
as 2:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Reeves
Defendant:
Diesslin, Lewis and Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lopez v. Godwin
as 1:2022cv00735
Petitioner:
Jorge Mejia Lopez
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus and Rod Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
